Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Make way for the Spider Pig!!!!!

Does something get better over time? Will the years age it or will it become better with time? With The Simpsons Movie time only made it more rewarding. 18 years in the making The Simpsons Movie is easily one of the best and funniest movies I’ve ever seen. The plot is compelling and honestly emotional while the story still carries jokes. For those nay sayers who think that The Simpsons has lost it’s comedic edge, well you just have to see The Simpsons Movie. This movie definitely did not disappoint. The diehard Simpsons fans as well as the casual movie goers will all be incredibly impressed with this big screen animated comedy. Matt Groening and company went all out for this one, creating a film that is FAR more than “just an hour-and-a-half version of the TV show.” The comedy is really top-notch.
The writers were at the top of their game when creating the classic satirical humor that the Simpsons has become famous for. There is a great mix of satire and low-brow humor – just enough to appease the Beavis’s of the world, as well as the Frasier’s. As with the television show, the movie does get fairly political at times, but keeps it funny and never gets preachy.
The creators kept a tight lid on the plot of the movie throughout, which really help to add to the excitement of the experience. As usual, Homer creates a monumental problem that threatens life in Springfield as we know it. It is then up to…well, Homer… to solve the problem. The plot centers around Homer and his newly acquired pet pig(this one's incredibly funny, spider pig!!!), as well as the Environmental Protection Agency and their attempts to solve the pollution problem of Springfield. After a series of events (including a giant dome over the city, a sink hole, and a near lynching by the townsfolk), the Simpsons end up in Alaska only to realize,( some more quickly than others!!), that Springfield is their home and is worth saving.Family values upheld again, God save America!!!









Matt Groening, the creator of the simpsons has managed to come up yet again with a movie which manages to entertain while bringing into focus the burning issues of our times and then making a satirical, wickedly humorous parody out of it all. The movie sticks to the the general stand taken by the simpsons over the years, taking digs at republican politicians and violation of civil rights( they managed to actually bush-bash without bringing bush into it!!!wicked!!!), devout church-goers ( It's not that the Simpsons is about atheist propaganda; its main target is not belief in God or the supernatural, but the arrogance of particular organised religions that they, amazingly, know the will of the creator!!), the whole brouhaha over the environment( somehow the movie manages to mock both sides, the rabid environmentalists as well as ignorant,polluting americans!!!),america's infatuation with superheroes(spider pig hahaha!!), as well as a host of other things and actually manages to make the viewer reflect on the sorry state of affairs even as he's rolling in the aisles with laughter.


A special mention of the quality of animation in the movie.Evidently the style is much richer and deeper. You can notice a lot more objects in the background, more detail on houses, more color in peoples hair and wordrobes, and other things that make the film just stand out. It’s a great example of 2D animation that is as good, if not better, than all of the 3D movies out there these days.
The greatest voice-over actors in the history of the universe came together to form this ensemble cast and their talents were really on display. From Dan Castellaneta and Nancy Cartwright to (my personal favorites) Hank Azaria and Harry Shearer, this cast is awesome. These are the standard Simpson’s voice-overs, but I think that they deserve TONS of respect for the work they’ve been doing over the years.
Tom Hanks and Green Day have hilarious cameos in the film, and Tony Mantegna and Albert Brooks are also cast.
This movie was really everything that I was hoping for. Hardly surprising,since the television show itself is, quite simply, one of the greatest cultural artefacts of our generation.And the movie brought together all of the great things that i love about the Simpsons and really left me wanting some more. The humor continues throughout, even after the credits roll. I loved it, and I highly recommend that you go see it.


Tuesday, August 7, 2007

The pursuit of excellence...

Bring me my Bow of burning gold:

Bring me my Arrows of desire:
Bring me my Spear:
O clouds unfold!Bring me my Chariot of fire!

- William Blake





Although I recognize that the word amateur often has pejorative connotations, I am personally drawn to the idea and ideal of the amateur. I generally prefer amateur to professional athletics and deplore the intrusion of a professional ethic into lower levels of athletics—until even youth sports are deadly serious, drained of the joy of the game by the relentless pursuit of quasi-professional athletic excellence. I am likewise suspicious of advertisers' attempts to convince me to hire professionals because as an amateur I would surely botch the job. We live in the age of the professional. I long for the age of the amateur, when a da Vinci could excel in science and art and a Newton and a Leibniz could not only each independently invent calculus but explore moral philosophy and theology as well.The word amateur derives from the Latin for "love." An amateur is at root a lover—a lover of sport, science, art, and so forth. It is this sense of amateur that I believe we must preserve if we are to achieve a more excellent way. There is much to recommend the professional ethic, including rigor, methodology, high standards of review, and so forth. Yet I hope we never cease to be amateurs in our professions—that is, passionate devotees of our disciplines.









The film Chariots of Fire is organized around the contrast between the professional and the amateur. The movie tells the true story of Harold Abrahams and Eric Liddell—both gifted sprinters and both, eventually, gold medalists in the 1924 Olympics. Abrahams exemplifies the spirit of the professional: he is driven, highly coached, obsessed with winning and personal glory. Liddell, by contrast, embodies the spirit of the amateur: he is joyous, heartfelt, animated by the love of running and the glory of God. Abrahams runs on his nerves; when asked why he runs, he says winning is a weapon against pervasive anti-Semitism. Liddell runs from his heart; he says he runs for God.We see this contrast in their respective running styles. Abrahams' running is technically sophisticated and fierce; he scowls his way across the finish line. By contrast, Liddell runs like a wild animal across the hillsides. At a certain point in each race, Liddell leans back his head, opens his mouth, and turns on the jets—abandoning himself to the pure expression of his divine gift. This accurate portrayal of Liddell's running style symbolizes that his running is inspired. Inspire literally means "breathed into" by God. Liddell's inspired passion for his sport is captured by a famous line from the movie spoken to his sister Jenny, who is worried that he is forgetting his higher commitment to God and to an eventual mission to China:"I believe that God made me for a purpose. For China. But He also made me fast. And when I run, I feel His pleasure. To give it up would be to hold Him in contempt. You were right. It's not just fun. To win is to honor Him."Liddell is required to choose between God and a possible Olympic gold medal. His qualifying heat for the 100-meter dash is scheduled for Sunday. Against great pressure, including from the Prince of Wales, he refuses to violate the Sabbath. Fortunately, he is given a chance to run the 400-meter dash instead and wins the gold.As an amateur runner, Eric Liddell exemplified a more excellent way to greatness—a way rooted in love for his discipline and the divine. I see Liddell as a model for the kind of excellence we should seek in our lives. Most of you will agree that we need to be committed not just to winning but to the larger purposes of existence. By the same token, we need not only to run like the wind, figuratively speaking, but to run for God; delight in the intellectual gifts that make us strong of judgment and quick of wit, yet exercise them in the context of our covenants; pursue our careers with vigor, not for laud but for love. Which is to say that we need to be professionally excellent but still retain the spirit of the amateur.






Ours should be a more excellent way to personal excellence.I am constantly reminded of my childhood whenever i think of excellence. I grew up in a town called Jamshedpur, which is home to the Tatas. Tatas exemplify everything about excellence in the ways which they operate their conglomerate. JRD Tata, the doyen of indian industry, was the driving force behind the Tatas' philosophy, where excellence is a way of life. In fact, every new manager in any Tata group company is required to understand two things during his induction : the Tata code of ehtics and the Tata model of excellence. Hence i refute my own argument and prove that professionalism and excellence can flourish symbiotically, albeit under extremely unique conditions.









But I have a deeper concern about the uncritical pursuit of excellence. Excellence was originally a pagan concept. It comes from the Greek areté, which means being the best, whether as an athlete or warrior, sculptor or shoemaker, poet or prostitute.Christianity has traditionally been ambivalent about this ideal of excellence. The desire to excel is generally wrapped up with pride, vanity, selfishness, and other attitudes opposed to Christian humility, meekness, and cooperation. Our contemporary ears may be tone deaf to the divine dissonance regarding the word excel here. We might say, "I thought God wants us to excel." Well, He wants us to be good. And He expects us to do our very best but not to lust for excellence as the world does.






A Hellenized Jew, Paul daily negotiated the tension between the Greek culture of excellence and the Christian culture of humility. He knew about the problematic pagan connotations of areté; he also knew its power. The phrase "a more excellent way" derives from Paul's first epistle to the Corinthian Saints. Corinth was the site of the Isthmian Games, whose fame rivaled that of the Olympics. Paul alludes to these games, encouraging the Saints to devote themselves to righteousness with the same dedication athletes bring to the pursuit of victory:Do you not know that in a race all the runners compete, but only one receives the prize? So run that you may obtain it. Every athlete exercises self-control in all things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. Paul co-opts the Greek ideal of athletic excellence to describe the Christian quest for perfection. Christians must strive for excellence in the race of life—not for a fading crown of laurel leaves but for an immortal crown. Paul later describes his own life in such terms:I have finished the race, I have kept the faith.Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award to me on that Day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing. For Paul, Christian excellence entails the same striving and effort as does Greek excellence. The Christian, however, doesn't look sideways at his competitors but upward to a "righteous judge" who passes out victor's crowns to all who love Him. This is a more excellent way to professional excellence. It is the way of pure love. Areté is grounded on agape—that is, excellence on charity. In fact, the phrase "a more excellent way" serves as a bridge to Paul's great discourse on charity. Charity is the more excellent way.My school ,Loyola, has a motto: In caritate et justitia, in charity and in justice. This summarizes the Jesuit way of life, where the pursuit of excellence is only superseeded by the pursuit of love towards humanity. May we bring this pure love to our professions and qualify for crowns that never fade.



Monday, August 6, 2007

The Travelling Wilbury's




The Traveling Wilburys were a folk rock supergroup consisting of George Harrison, Jeff Lynne, Roy Orbison, Tom Petty and Bob Dylan. During the short time they were together they recorded two albums, the first of which was nominated for a Grammy Award for Album of the Year.









Initially starting at a meal between Roy Orbison, George Harrison and Jeff Lynne, they got together at Bob Dylan's studio (Santa Monica, California) to record an additional track as a B-side for the single release of Harrison's "This Is Love". Tom Petty's involvement was by chance as Harrison had left his guitar at Petty's house. The song they came up with was "Handle with Care". However, the record company immediately realized it was too good to be released as a single "filler".
They enjoyed working together so much that they decided to create an album together. Written by all its members, the album was recorded over a ten-day period because Dylan was due to go on tour. Released in October 1988 (under various pseudonyms as half-brothers, supposed sons of Charles Truscott Wilbury, Sr.), the album Traveling Wilburys Vol. 1 was in 1989 ranked #70 on Rolling Stone magazine's list of the 100 greatest albums of the 1980s.It was later nominated for a Grammy under the category Album of the Year. The death of band member Roy Orbison (on December 6, 1988) prevented further full collaborations; however, the band continued without him. The band even finished the video for "End of the Line". In the scene where the verse is sung by Orbison, the viewer is shown Orbison's guitar in a rocking chair followed by a photo of the late artist.
"Wilburys" was a slang term coined by Harrison and Lynne during the recording of Cloud Nine as a reference to recorded "flubs" that could be eliminated during the mixing stage (i.e. "'We'll bury' them in the mix"). The term was used again when the entire group was together. Harrison suggested "The Trembling Wilburys" as the group's name, but they decided to use "Traveling" instead.
After Orbison's death, there was undocumented speculation in the news media that Del Shannon might join the band, but his 1990 suicide precluded any possible involvement.
A charity single entitled "Nobody's Child", aimed at drawing attention to the orphaned children of Romania, followed in early 1990, also with an album with others. A second album titled Traveling Wilburys Vol. 3 was released in October 1990. However, the album met with less success. Some possible reasons for the skip from Vol. 1 to Vol. 3 include the fact that some consider Tom Petty's Full Moon Fever as Vol. 2 (Jeff Lynne, George Harrison, and Roy Orbison perform on the album), a nod to the many bootlegs titled "Volume 2" containing early studio mixes/alternative takes, to honor the death of Roy Orbison by not releasing the project started with Orbison, or as a simple joke. Harrison once claimed in an MTV interview that the band had written material for a Vol. 2, but the material was stolen before completion. In the book in The Traveling Wilburys CD/DVD, the name is credited to 'George being George'.

















The 2007 revival



In the late 90s and early 2000s, the two Traveling Wilburys albums had limited availability and were out of print in most territories. Harrison, as primary holder of the rights, did not reissue them prior to his death. In June 2007, the two albums were reissued as a two CD and one DVD set, originally announced by Tom Petty on his XM radio show and in the February 2007 edition of Q Magazine in an interview with Jeff Lynne.
The Traveling Wilburys reissue resulted in two editions of the The Traveling Wilburys Collection release. Firstly, a standard edition (in a double Digipak packaging) which features both CD albums and a DVD with a documentary and music videos, along with a 16-page booklet, and secondly a deluxe boxed edition with the same CDs and DVD, plus extensive 40-page booklet and artist postcards and photographs. On the iTunes Store, a digital version of The Traveling Wilburys- The Collection contains both albums with bonus tracks, the twenty four minute documentary, and five music videos.
The release surprised everyone when it debuted straight at number one in the UK Album Charts . The collection entered the charts at 9 in the U.S.(Billboard Magazine, for the week ending June 30, 2007). The group also hit number one on the Australian album charts , Amazon's pre-order and sales list, and Apple's iTunes. The Traveling Wilburys Collection also debuted at #1 in the United World Chart. The album has apparnetly sold 500,000 copies worldwide during the first 3 weeks.



Members


The Traveling Wilburys of Volume 1 were:
Nelson Wilbury - George Harrison
Otis Wilbury - Jeff Lynne
Lefty Wilbury - Roy Orbison
Charlie T. Wilbury Jr. - Tom Petty
Lucky Wilbury - Bob Dylan
The Traveling Wilburys of Volume 3 were:
Spike Wilbury - George Harrison
Clayton Wilbury - Jeff Lynne
Muddy Wilbury - Tom Petty
Boo Wilbury - Bob Dylan
Jim Keltner, the session drummer and percussionist, was not listed as a Wilbury; however he is in some of the music videos. In the DVD released in 2007, he is given the Wilbury nickname 'Buster Sidebury'. Furthermore, overdubs to the unreleased tracks "Maxine" and "Like A Ship" credit Ayrton Wilbury, a pseudonym for Dhani Harrison

Sunday, August 5, 2007

Literary influences and popular culture...

When John Ronald Reuel Tolkien (1892-1973) was a child he heard the other kids in his neighborhood speaking a made-up language called Animalic.1 Tolkien contributed to the neighborhood's next imaginary language, Nevbosh ("new nonsense"). At age twelve Tolkien's mother passed away (his father having died when he was only a baby), and he found solace in the beginnings of what would become his life-long obsession: the construction of an elvish language. This fascination with languages eventually helped Tolkien attain a position as Merton Professor of English Language and Literature at Oxford, concentrating on philology. He spent most of his free time inventing "faerie languages": "Quenya" is reminiscent of Finnish, "Sindarin" of Welsh. As he crafted these languages Tolkien had a singular revelation: For a language to be "real," it has to consistently reflect a cultural perspective; the "story" of a culture. In other words, a real language both implies and demands a myth. For instance, the English word "excruciating" alludes to the story of the crucifixion of Christ.Tolkien published The Hobbit in 1936 and The Lord of the Rings in 1954. Both were written in service to Tolkien's imaginary languages, and he found it frustrating that most people assumed the reverse. In an article explaining his obsession called A Secret Vice Tolkien wrote, "The making of language and mythology are related functions. Your language construction will breed a mythology."Tolkien's work was a modestly successful "guilty pleasure" in academic circles for over a decade: professors and students were reluctant to admit how much they loved a story about "silly elf-and-dragon stuff." It wasn't until an American company illegally published a cheap edition in paperback that Tolkien's work finally reached the mainstream. By the mid-sixties The Lord of the Rings was probably the most influential fantasy story in the Western world, occupying the same position Star Wars did in the late seventies and Wagner's Ring Cycle did toward the end of the 19th century.Lucas has often cited The Lord of the Rings as a major influence on Star Wars. The superficial stuff is the most obvious, but the subtle lesson Lucas learned from Tolkien is how to handle the delicate stuff of myth. Tolkien wrote that myth and fairytale seem to be the best way to communicate morality - hints for choosing between right and wrong - and in fact that may be their primary purpose. Tolkien was devoutly Christian, and wrestled a bit with figuring out how to talk about The Christian Bible. He observed that the New Testament in particular is structured just like a myth, and wanted to be able to explore that without giving anyone the impression that he was belittling what he saw as a genuine divine revelation. Finally he decided that the Bible is a true myth, and stories like The Lord of the Rings are "sub-creations."Star Wars may be "Flash Gordon on the outside," and the structure is mostly Campbell, but the heart, the myth, may draw most deeply from Tolkien. That doesn't mean Lucas ripped Tolkien off!! Tolkien's primary inspiration for the tricky good vs. evil stuff was Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (14th century CE, author unknown), and Tolkien recorded his frustration at being unable to find the sources for that story. He had no doubt that such sources existed, and hoped to learn from them the same way Lucas learned from him. All great stories have deep roots.Here are a few of the obvious similarities between Star Wars and The Lord of the Rings:

Star Wars .Lord of the Rings.

Obi-Wan and Luke's lightsabers glow blue. Darth's lightsaber glows red.Gandalf and Bilbo's magic swords glow blue. The Balrog's magic sword flames red.
Obi-Wan Kenobi Gandalf
Darth Vader The Witch-King of Angmar
Emperor Palpatine Sauron
Obi-Wan digs Anakin's lightsaber out of an old wooden box, gives to Luke.Bilbo digs his magic sword out of an old wooden box, gives to Frodo.
Darth cuts off Luke's hand, which plunges into the abyss with Luke's lightsaber.Gollum bites off Frodo's finger, which plunges into the abyss with the One Ring.
Yoda foretells the future, and Luke must decide whether to help his friends or not. Yoda warns that he's seen only one possible future. Galadriel foretells the future, and Sam must decide whether to help his friends or not. Galadriel warns that she's seen only one possible future.
Darth tries to convince Luke to join the dark side, thereby bringing order to the galaxy.Saruman tries to convince Gandalf to join the evil wizards, thereby bringing order to Middle Earth
Mysterious figure throws back hood of robe to reveal that he's Obi-Wan.Mysterious figure throws back hood of robe to reveal that he's Gandalf
Luke: "I shouldn't have come, I'm endangering the mission." (Because Darth can sense him).Glorfindel: "It is you, Frodo, and that which you bear that brings us into peril." (Because Sauron can sense the One Ring)
Luke watches from across a chasm as his mentor Obi-Wan duels with Darth Vader using blue and red lightsabers.Frodo watches from across a chasm as his mentor Gandalf duels with a Balrog using blue and red flaming magic swords.
Heroes are walking through a forest when they're surprised by ewoks, captured at spear-point, then taken to a village in the trees.Heroes are walking through a forest when they're surprised by elves, captured at arrow-point, then taken to a village in the trees








Tolkien's deepest linguistic influence was probably his discovery of The Kalevala (roughly "Song of the Land of Heroes") in the original Finnish, a joy he compared to drunkenness. He used it as the primary model for his own language, Quenya. Tolkien was fascinated with the idea of a magic relic so powerful (and metaphorically flexible) that it could serve as the center of an entire heroic epic. The Kalevala's version of the One Ring, the Tsampo, is described so vaguely that to this day scholars debate about what exactly it is. (A ring? A staff? The Golden Fleece?) This enticing ambiguity probably influenced Tolkien's idea that a great story never gives the reader all the answers. He wrote: "Part of the attraction of the L.R. is, I think due to the glimpses of a large history in the background: an attraction like that of viewing far off an unvisited island, or seeing the towers of a distant city gleaming in a sunlit mist. To go there is to destroy the magic, unless new unattainable vistas are again revealed." The Kalevala was collected into a single story in 1849 by Elias Lönnrot.



Another huge influence for LOTR was Beowulf. The earliest surviving epic poem written in English, Beowulf was most likely composed in the seventh or eighth century by an Anglian bard. Beowulf tells the story of a Scandinavian hero and his battles with the beast Grendle, Grendle's mother, and a dragon. Tolkien translated it, taught it, wrote papers about it... it is no exaggeration to say that Beowulf's current position as a "classic" in Western academia is due in no small part to Tolkien's efforts and prestige. Tolkien loved Beowulf because it was the first story he'd ever read by a Christian that portrayed the Pagans not as godless savages, but a sympathetic and noble people. Tolkien saw Beowulf as a magnificent reconciliation between the two cultures. He also loved the great heroes, monsters, swords and orcs, which he borrowed for his own stories. The halls of Beorn and Théoden are very closely modeled on Heorot, the hall of Beowulf's friend Hrothgar, king of the Danes.The basic plot for The Hobbit is probably borrowed from this offhand line in Beowulf "...a dragon on the prowl from the sleep vaults of a stone-roofed barrow where he guarded a hoard; there was a hidden passage, unknown to men, but someone managed to enter by it and interfere with the heathen trove. He had handled and removed a gem-studded goblet; it gained him nothing, though with a thief's wiles he had outwitted the sleeping dragon; that drove him into rage, as the people of that country would soon discover."


The other major source for The Hobbit is probably Tolkien's favorite childhood story, The Story of Sigurd, as published in The Red Fairy Book (1890) by Andrew Lang (1844-1912). Hobbit also includes a few ideas from H. Rider Haggard (1856-1925), in particular from King Solomon's Mines (1885) and She (1886).Tolkien even borrows his title from Beowulf: line 2345 reads, "Oferhogaode ða hringa fengel," usually translated "Yet the prince of the rings was too proud..." This suggests Beowulf's trait of sharing gold rings and other spoils of war with his men, thus earning their loyalty. I strongly suspect that Tolkien translated this title of Beowulf's as "Lord of the Rings."



The Lord of the Rings was also influenced by Le Morte D'Arthur, the "definitive" story of King Arthur written by Sir Thomas Malory in 1485. Tolkien considered it a shame that the English thought of King Arthur as their central myth, since he felt it was "essentially French." One of his goals in writing LOTR was to give England a myth which was truly English. Tolkien's favorite King Arthur story was Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (14th c., anonymous). The title of the third volume in LOTR, The Return of the King is probably inspired by the common British legend that King Arthur, like Christ, will one day return to reward good and punish evil (a title probably echoed by Return of the Jedi).



While Tolkien borrowed the form of the epic and several great ideas from The Kalevala, Beowulf and Le Morte D'Arthur, his greatest influence was probably Norse mythology. The Lord of the Rings reinvigorates ideas from every major work of the Norse cannon: The Elder (Poetic) Edda (composed between 800-1200 CE, authors unknown), The Younger (Prose) Edda (Snorri Sturluson, 1222 CE), The Volsunga Saga (13th c, author unknown), Das Nibelungenlied (13th c, author unknown), Thidreks Saga (c. 1200 CE, author unknown), and Heimskringla or The Chronicle of the Kings of Norway (Snorri Sturluson, c.1225 CE).



So its apparent how epics of yore have inspired the blockbusters of each generation. If the Lord of the Rings was popular during the 50's and 60's, Star wars was the magnum opus of the 70's and 80's. So is it fair to blame a certain Ms.Rowling of pilferage simply because she adapted the best of literature into a tale which caught the attention of the internet generation and defined modern fantasy fiction? I think not, and whatever criticism Harry potter and his adventures have been subjected to fails to see the impact rowling created in young and old minds alike, literally bringing reading back into fashion.

Saturday, August 4, 2007

A tribute to two icons of world cinema

"Creativity is… seeing something that doesn’t exist already. You need to find out how you can bring it into being and that way be a playmate to God." – Michele Shea.



It’s easy to trace the roots of today’s language of film back to seventies Hollywood and its generation of “Whiz Kids.” From Steven Spielberg’s touch and three actions within a take styles, to George Lucas’ innovative special effects, to the ultra-realism and character darkness brought out by Martin Scorsese and Paul Schrader, the influences between those films and today’s films can easily be identified (and most hardcore enthusiasts, myself included, would say that today’s cinema has actually taken a step backwards from that magical time.)But while those directors most certainly developed their voices on their own, obviously they were influenced by filmmakers before them, and two of the largest influences upon them and many others from the last century, passed away this week, strangely enough, on the same day. Ingmar Bergman, Swedish auteur extraordinaire with over 50 films and 100 theatrical productions to his credit died in his sleep last Monday at his home on an island off the coast of Sweden. He was 89.That same day, Michelangelo Antonioni, a visualist and pillar of Italian Cinema, died at his home in Rome. He was 94.While neither had the worldwide box office success shared by their peers or predecessors, you would be hard pressed to find two more well respected filmmakers, who were sighted as being two men who helped push not only European cinema, but cinema of the world to new heights.


Ingmar Bergman with cinematographer Sven Nykvist



Born July 14th, 1918, Ingmar Bergman began his film career revising scripts in 1942 at Svensk Filmindustri, Sweden’s largest production company at that time. It wasn’t long before his own original scripts were being produced. Soon after, he moved from writer/theater director to film director. He made a succession of films but garnered his first international attention with his film “Smiles of a Summer Night” which was very well received at the 1955 Cannes Film festival. He used the success of that project, to make his next film, which was his passion project “The Seventh Seal.” This is probably his most famous work and gives us one of the lasting images in cinematic history, that of “death” personified (and played brilliantly by Swedish actor Bengt Ekerot.)From that point on the rest is history, as Bergman made critical hit after critical hit (Check out “Wild Strawberries” and “Fanny and Alexander” for some more of his best work.) Three of his films won Academy Awards as “Best Foreign Language Film” and he was personally nominated nine times. He was given the Honorary Irving G. Thalberg award for his lifetime achievements by the Academy in 1971. Bergman style is one of indelible imagery (shot by his longtime collaborator and Cinematographer Sven Nykvist, a legend in his own right) mixed with themes that draw questions about the mysteries of mankind and human existence. Bergman’s name became synonymous with serious filmmaking, and he seemed to explore deeper and darker issues, as he got older. The influence of Bergman's works are noticed in the tone and style of films by Woody Allen, Ridley Scott, David Fincher and Sam Mendes.




Director Michelangelo Antonioni







While Bergman explored larger themes and the existence of man, Antonioni explored the simpler yet darker sides of humanity and realism. Like Bergman, Antonioni liked long takes and close ups, unlike Bergman, he didn’t like to explore such broad and universal themes, instead concentrating on the dark nature of man himself, and the loneliness and isolations created by modern society. Born Sept 29th, 1912 in Ferrera Italy, Antonioni got his start in film as an editor during the early days of World War II. Even after being drafted into the army he established himself as a fine documentary writer and after the war was finished got into features. Antonioni made several less prolific features before striking cinematic gold in 1960 with “L’Avventura” the story of a couple who goes looking for a missing woman, only to completely forget about her as they fall for each other. This movie won the grand jury prize at Cannes although is was famously hissed at by the audience as some members shouted “Cut!” at the screen, in reference to the LONG takes Antonioni used. Think about that for a second. It is astonishing that a movie that appears on multiple best movies ever lists was HISSED at during its world premier showing by the Cannes audience.

An iconic image from Antonioni's "Blow Up"






Four years later he would make his first English language -- and most successful film -- “Blow Up.” Set against London’s swinging sixties, it’s the story of an English photographer who may or may not have accidentally captured a murder on film. This film not only garnered him Oscar nominations for directing and writing, but also gave him a whole new generation of fans. This film more than any of the others by him or Bergman was a MAJOR influence on the next generations of filmmakers and has basically been re-made twice, by two of the “Whiz Kids” finest, Francis Ford Coppola ("The Conversation") and Brian De Palma ("Blow Out.") He never again captured the magic of “Blow Up” but was awarded an Honorary Lifetime achievement award by the Academy in 1995, and made a segment for the film “Eros” along with Steven Soderbergh and Wong Kar-wai.His works influenced not only the ‘Whiz Kids’ themselves, but can be seen in the works of P.T. Anderson, Anthony Minghella, and quite possibly, Bret Easton Ellis (The last one I can’t prove but I do find striking similarities in their work.).Admittedly, while I have seen a lot of their works, I am not as knowledgeable about these two as I would like to be.
Bergman worshiped the work of fellow Swede, Stringberg - who is probably the most famous artist to come from the Nordic Country (save for ABBA, of course!!). He strived in his writings to present the bleak, 'Swedish Perspective'. Blanketed in darkness for much of the year the Swedes are known as masters of morose and dark storytelling, all the time lined with tiny bits of hopes and joy. Bergman was a quintessential Swede. He brought the dark side if humanity into the light and allowed the whole world to share in his internal horrors.Just one viewing of "Fanny & Alexander" and then "Persona" shows today’s gore-porn directors how to frighten without blood, just looks, just color, just dialogue.Then Bergman turns the corner with a film like "Smiles on a Summer Night," or "Wild Strawberries." Light hearted and sublime, these films show the classic 'summerlife' of the Swedes. When the winter disappears (for all of 6 weeks) the entire country goes loopy and Bergman captured it perfectly.

Death plays chess in Bergman's "The Seventh Seal"




All this and we've not talked about "Seventh Seal." Death plays chess (sickle and all!!) with our hero, Max Von Sydow. This is probably the most spoofed scene in all of cinema, pre-"Star Wars" of course. Bergman's images traveled around the world and established him as the master of twentieth century cinema.Bergman was more prolific (in my humble opinion) than Fellini, simply because he never stopped making films. His influence on cinema was more powerful than Kurosawa because he dealt always in the human condition on a level and sincerity that no one else could touch. In a lot of ways he did what Kubrick did before his time, he never made a bad film. They were not all perfect, but they all were unique and dripped of a singular artists vision. Something which is becoming rarer and rarer in today's Hollywood-influenced system.


Antonioni and Fellini were the right and left hands of Italian cinema. Where Fellini explored masterfully the wonderfully ridiculous side of life, Antonioni captured its stagnant darkness. His characters were always in search of something they rarely found and when they did, it wasn't what they thought it was. And did we mention everyone looked AMAZING in his film? They were practically filmed fashion shoots. Monica Vitti and Gabriele Ferzetti were the original Italian fashion models. Antonioni invented modern Italian style with his films. The forlorn lovers looks, the perfectly manicured hair and beautiful clothes, its a marvel of the movie crafts. Much like Bergman's films being quintessentially Swedish, Antonioni's films were quintessentially Italian. Whatever pictures come to mind when you think of Italian style and grace were first formulated for the world to see by Antonioni. He captured his peoples grace like no other and influenced the world with his lens.


I hope that by now you realize that i highly recommend checking out as much of their works as possible. You may find it slow, and it is definitely a whole lot different than most of the fast food, MTV generation films, but they are indeed very profound works that carry a deeper meaning and craft that you just don’t see a lot in cinema these days. I think both of these men were best summed up by Cannes Film Festival Director, Gilles Jacob, who after learning of Bergman’s death said that Bergman was the “last of the greats because he proved that cinema can be as profound as literature.”


This is my first post in this blog, and it was apt that i wrote on a subject very close to my heart;cinema. Subsequent posts would deal with subjects like music, art, literature and sports.
Thank you for reading this and have a great sunday...